Scale calibration: scale classes, standards, test weights and intervals

An overview of scale and balance calibration: scale accuracy classes, the EURAMET, NIST, OIML and USP documents that apply, which test weights match which scale, balance uncertainty and intervals. The step-by-step method is in our separate procedure.

Scale calibration means placing weights of known, traceable mass on a scale or balance and recording how far its readings are from those masses: at several loads across its range (errors of indication), repeatedly at one load (repeatability) and at different positions on the pan (eccentricity), with the uncertainty of each result (EURAMET cg-18, §4.1 and §5). It does not change the scale (VIM 2.39). Pressing the CAL button, or letting a balance adjust itself with its built-in weight, is an adjustment at one load (VIM 3.11): useful, but it says nothing about the rest of the range.

This page is the overview. For the CAL button, the three tests step by step, worked examples and USP <41>, see how to calibrate a scale.

Scale classes and the test weights they need

US and international rules group scales into four accuracy classes, and NIST Handbook 105-1 gives the weight classes that are likely to be suitable for each (HB 105-1, Table 1):

Scale class (Handbook 44 / OIML R 76) Typical examples ASTM E617 weights OIML R 111 weights
I (special) Analytical and micro balances 1 F1
II (high) Precision balances, jewelry scales 1, 2 F1, F2
III (medium) Bench, counting, platform and retail scales 3 to 6 M1, M2, M1–2, M2–3
IIII (ordinary) Coarse industrial scales 3 to 6 M3

The rule behind the table: a weight’s error, plus its uncertainty if you use it at its nominal value, should stay below one third of the tolerance at the load you test (Handbook 44, App. A 3.2; OIML R 76-1, 3.7.1). Check the actual numbers at your loads; the procedure has two worked examples.

Standards and guides that apply

Document Scope Access
EURAMET cg-18 (v4.0) Calibration of non-automatic weighing instruments: tests, uncertainty, certificate, minimum weight Free
NIST Handbook 44 (2026) US legal requirements and tolerances for commercial scales, adopted by all 50 states (NIST OWM, Weighing FAQs) Free
NIST Handbook 105-1 Field standard weights, and which weight classes suit which scale class Free
OIML R 76-1:2006 International requirements for non-automatic weighing instruments Free
OIML R 111-1:2004 Weight classes E1 to M3 and their maximum permissible errors Free
ASTM E617-23 US classes for laboratory weights and precision mass standards Paid
USP <41> and <1251> Balances in pharmaceutical work; revised chapters official since February 1, 2026 Paid

Calibration is not legal verification. A scale used to sell or charge by weight is a commercial device: it should have an active NTEP Certificate of Conformance and must be approved by the state where it is used (NIST OWM, Weighing FAQs). The procedure explains how the two differ.

Balance measurement uncertainty

EURAMET cg-18 splits the uncertainty of each error into the uncertainty of the indication (repeatability, display resolution, eccentricity) and the uncertainty of the reference mass (the weight certificates, their drift, air buoyancy and convection) (cg-18, §7.1). It keeps that uncertainty at calibration separate from the larger uncertainty of an everyday weighing, which adds temperature changes, drift between calibrations and how the balance is used (cg-18, §7.4). The relative uncertainty grows as the load gets smaller, which is where the minimum weight comes from: the smallest net sample whose relative uncertainty still meets your requirement (cg-18, App. G). Build a budget with the uncertainty calculator.

How often to calibrate a scale

EURAMET cg-18, OIML R 76 and Handbook 44 set no calibration interval for scales used outside legal metrology. Base it on risk, use and history, the risk-based approach the 2026 revision of USP <41> also asks for (ECA Academy, 2024), and recalibrate after the scale is moved: a certificate shouldn’t be accepted for a scale moved after calibration unless it is shown to be immune to the move (cg-18, §4.1.2). The weights need calibrating too: for field standard weights, NIST notes intervals often start at one year and are extended based on stability data, generally not beyond five years (HB 105-1, §6.4). See calibration intervals.

FAQ

Why does an analytical balance have measurement uncertainty?

Because every part of a weighing varies a little: the balance does not repeat exactly, its display rounds, the reading depends on where the load sits on the pan, and the test weights have their own uncertainty, drift, and an air buoyancy that depends on the day's air density. EURAMET cg-18 combines these into the uncertainty of each calibration result. Everyday weighings add more, such as temperature changes and drift between calibrations, which is why the in-use uncertainty is larger than the calibration uncertainty.

What does a NIST-traceable scale mean?

It means the scale was calibrated with test weights whose own calibration links to the SI, usually through NIST, by a documented chain of calibrations with stated uncertainties. The scale itself is not traceable; its calibration results are. Look for a certificate with the errors at several loads, the repeatability and eccentricity results and the uncertainty. NIST does not certify traceability claims made by others.

Can the same scale be used for trade and for lab work?

A scale used to sell or charge by weight in the US must meet NIST Handbook 44, should have an active NTEP Certificate of Conformance, and must be inspected and approved by the state where it is used. That legal approval is not a calibration with uncertainty, and a calibration is not legal approval. A lab or production scale needs a calibration against your own tolerance; a trade scale needs both if you also use it for quality decisions.

Related guides

Sources

  1. EURAMET. EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 18 (cg-18), Guidelines on the Calibration of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments, version 4.0. 2015 — Current version (checked 2026-10-16). §1, §4.1–4.4, §5, §6, §7.1–7.5, §8, App. G, App. H1 (pp. 60–67). Figures cited, not reproduced: cg-18 may be reproduced only in full, extracts need EURAMET's permission
  2. OIML. OIML R 76-1:2006, Non-automatic weighing instruments, Part 1: Metrological and technical requirements. 2006 — 3.2 (Table 3), 3.5.1–3.5.2 (Table 6), 3.6.1–3.6.2, 3.7.1, 3.9.2. Under revision; 2006 is the current edition
  3. OIML. OIML R 111-1:2004, Weights of classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1-2, M2, M2-3 and M3 (with Amendment 2025). 2004 — 1.3.1 (classes), 5.2, Table 1 (maximum permissible errors)
  4. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices, 2026 edition. 2026 — G-T.1, G-T.2; 2.20 Scales: Table 3, N.1.2.1, N.2, T.N.3.1–T.N.3.2, Table 6, T.N.4.4, T.N.5, UR.3.1 (Table 8); App. A 3.2
  5. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. NIST Handbook 105-1, Specifications and Tolerances for Field Standard Weights. 2019 — §4, Table 1 (weight classes for each scale class) and note; §6.4
  6. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. Weighing FAQs — Handbook 44 adoption, NTEP Certificate of Conformance, state approval; checked 2026-10-16
  7. ASTM International. ASTM E617-23, Standard Specification for Laboratory Weights and Precision Mass Standards (scope). 2023 — Paid standard; classes and scope only (1.1, 1.3)
  8. ECA Academy (gmp-compliance.org). USP: Chapters Balances <41> and Weighing on an Analytical Balance <1251> final. 2025 — Both chapters finalized, official February 2026
  9. ECA Academy (gmp-compliance.org). USP: Commenting on Balances <41> and Weighing on an Analytical Balance <1251> possible again. 2024 — Scope of the revision official in 2026
  10. NIST. NIST Policy on Metrological Traceability. 2024
  11. JCGM / BIPM. International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), JCGM 200:2012. 2012 — 2.39 calibration, 3.11 adjustment