How to calibrate a scale: test weights, eccentricity, linearity and repeatability

How to calibrate a scale or balance: what the CAL button really does, how to choose test weights, the repeatability, error-of-indication and eccentricity tests, uncertainty, minimum weight and USP <41>, and how calibration differs from legal-for-trade verification.

Updated 17 primary sourcesHow we researchCite

On this page
  1. Can you calibrate a scale at home?
  2. Calibration, adjustment and legal-for-trade verification
  3. What you need to calibrate a scale
  4. Test loads and the three tests
  5. Step-by-step scale calibration procedure
  6. Acceptance criteria and measurement uncertainty
  7. Minimum weight and USP <41>
  8. What to record on a scale calibration certificate
  9. How often to calibrate a scale
  10. Common mistakes when calibrating a scale
  11. Related guides
  12. FAQ
  13. Sources

To calibrate a scale, you place weights of known, traceable mass on it under controlled conditions and record how far its readings are from those masses: at several loads across its range, repeatedly at one load, and at different positions on the pan. Then you work out the uncertainty of those results and decide whether the scale is good enough for its use. That is the method in EURAMET cg-18, the free guide that Europe’s national metrology institutes wrote for calibration laboratories (cg-18, §4.1 and §5). Pressing the CAL button on a kitchen or lab scale with one weight is something else: an adjustment that resets the scale at one point. It is useful, but on its own it tells you nothing about the rest of the range.

This page covers both: what you can do at home with a digital scale and what that doesn’t prove, then the full procedure for scales and balances in quality, lab and pharmaceutical work, with two worked examples, USP <41> and how calibration differs from legal-for-trade verification.

Can you calibrate a scale at home?

You can check it, and you can adjust it if it has a calibration mode. Whether the result counts as a calibration depends on what you compare it with and what you record:

Adjustment (CAL button) Home check Calibration
What it does Resets the scale so it reads the weight you put on Shows whether the scale reads close to a known weight Measures the errors of the scale and their uncertainty
Reference The mass the scale asks for, or a built-in weight A calibration weight, or an object of known mass Test weights with a calibration certificate, traceable to the SI
Loads One (span) or three (linearity) One or two At least five across the range, plus repeatability and off-center tests (cg-18, §5)
Result “CAL done” “Reads about right” Errors at each load with their uncertainty, as found and as left
Good for Everyday use, after moving the scale Hobby use, a sanity check between calibrations Quality systems, labs, pharma, customer and audit evidence

How to use the CAL button on a digital scale

The exact sequence depends on the model, so the manual comes first. The pattern is usually the same:

  1. Set the scale up properly. A hard, level, stable surface, away from drafts, vents and vibration. Level the scale if it has a bubble.
  2. Warm it up. Leave it switched on for the time the manual gives. One lab balance guide, for example, asks for five minutes after the balance has reached room temperature (OHAUS, Navigator Calibration Guide).
  3. Enter calibration mode with the button or key combination in the manual. The scale zeros itself with the pan empty.
  4. Place the mass it asks for in the center of the pan when prompted. That is often the capacity or a round value; a “span” calibration uses zero plus this one mass, and a “linearity” calibration uses zero, mid-scale and full scale (OHAUS).
  5. Wait for the confirmation, remove the weight and check the scale with a different known weight if you have one. Checking with the same weight you used to adjust it proves nothing about that weight.

The adjustment can only be as good as the weight. A “100 g” weight bought online without a certificate may be fine, or it may be off by more than the scale’s resolution; you don’t know until it is compared with a calibrated one.

What you can test without calibration weights

Two of the three standard tests don’t need a known mass. EURAMET cg-18 allows loads that are not calibrated for the repeatability and eccentricity tests, as long as their mass stays constant during the test (cg-18, §4.3, §5.1 and §5.3). So with any stable object (a full can, a stack of coins taped together):

  • Repeatability: put it on and take it off ten times, zeroing in between, and note the spread. Compare it with the repeatability in the scale’s specification, if it has one.
  • Off-center loading: put it in the center, then at the front left, back left, back right and front right of the pan. The readings should be the same.

What you can’t check without a known mass is whether the number is right. Coins and food packages have nominal masses, not measured ones, so they can tell you that a scale is grossly wrong, not that it is accurate.

Three operations get called “calibration”. They are different, and confusing them is behind many audit findings and arguments with service companies.

  • Calibration compares the scale with traceable test weights and states the errors and their uncertainty. It does not change the scale (VIM 2.39). EURAMET cg-18 describes it as applying test loads under specified conditions, determining the error or variation of the indication and evaluating the uncertainty (cg-18, §4.1).
  • Adjustment changes the scale so it reads closer to the reference: the CAL routine, a built-in (“internal calibration”) weight, or a technician’s span and linearity settings. After an adjustment the scale usually has to be calibrated again (VIM 3.11, Note 3). A scale that is normally adjusted before use should be adjusted before the calibration too, with the means the user normally applies, unless agreed otherwise; for high-resolution balances, cg-18 recommends adjusting immediately before the calibration and before use (cg-18, §4.1.3).
  • Legal verification is the official check that a commercial scale (one used to sell, buy or charge by weight) meets the legal tolerances. In the US the rules are in NIST Handbook 44, adopted by all 50 states, and a commercial scale needs an active NTEP Certificate of Conformance plus approval by the state where it is used (NIST OWM, Weighing FAQs). Internationally, OIML R 76 sets the requirements for non-automatic weighing instruments.

Internal vs external calibration. A balance with a built-in weight adjusts itself, sometimes automatically when it is switched on or when the temperature changes (EURAMET’s example balance does both; cg-18, App. H1.1). That keeps the sensitivity right between calibrations, but it is a one-point adjustment with a weight inside the balance: it doesn’t check the other loads, repeatability or off-center errors. The calibration certificate should state whether the balance was adjusted internally or externally, and with which weight (cg-18, §8.2).

Legal tolerance vs calibration. A calibration has no built-in pass/fail limit: it reports errors. Pass or fail comes from a tolerance you apply, which can be your process requirement, the manufacturer’s specification, or the legal tolerance for the scale’s accuracy class. Handbook 44 and OIML R 76 express that tolerance in verification scale intervals (e) and let it step up with the load:

Handbook 44 maintenance tolerance (Table 6) 1 e 2 e 3 e 5 e
Class I 0 to 50,000 e 50,001 to 200,000 e above 200,000 e —
Class II 0 to 5,000 e 5,001 to 20,000 e above 20,000 e —
Class III 0 to 500 e 501 to 2,000 e 2,001 to 4,000 e above 4,000 e
Class IIII 0 to 50 e 51 to 200 e 201 to 400 e above 400 e

Maintenance tolerances apply to scales in use; acceptance tolerances, half as large, apply to scales put into commercial use for the first time, and to the first official test within 30 days of being placed in service or of corrective service, major reconditioning or overhaul (Handbook 44, G-T.1, G-T.2 and 2.20 T.N.3.2). OIML R 76 works the other way round: its table gives 0.5 e, 1 e and 1.5 e for initial verification, and the limits in service are twice those (R 76, 3.5.1, 3.5.2).

What you need to calibrate a scale

  • Test weights

    Standard weights with a valid calibration certificate, traceable to the SI

    Either a measured conventional mass with its uncertainty, or confirmation that each weight is within its maximum permissible error. Weights that meet OIML R 111 also meet the density, surface and magnetism requirements.

    EURAMET cg-18, §4.3.1

  • Accuracy ratio

    Weight error (plus uncertainty, if used at nominal value) below one-third of the tolerance at that load

    The rule in Handbook 44 (App. A 3.2) and OIML R 76 (3.7.1), and in USP <41> as written until January 2026. Check your ratio with the TUR calculator.

    Handbook 44, App. A 3.2; OIML R 76-1, 3.7.1

  • Loads for the comparative tests

    One stable load of about Max/3 (eccentricity) and one of 50–100 % of Max (repeatability)

    They don't need to be calibrated unless you also use them for the error test.

    EURAMET cg-18, §5.1, §5.3

  • Environment

    Stable temperature, no drafts or vibration, relative humidity 40–60 %

    NIST suggests about ±2 °C per day for general weighing and ±1 °C per day for high precision. Below 40 % RH static electricity causes erratic readings.

    NIST GMP 10, §1

  • Thermometer (and barometer)

    Air temperature near the scale, recorded at least once

    Pressure or altitude helps with air buoyancy on high-resolution balances.

    EURAMET cg-18, §5.4

  • Paperwork

    Scale identification (Max, d, e, class), tolerance, procedure and record form

    Decide the tolerance before you start. See how to write a calibration procedure.

Calibrate the scale where it is used. Moving it afterward can change its readings through a different local gravity, a different environment or the transport itself, and cg-18 says a certificate shouldn’t be accepted as evidence of traceability for a scale moved after calibration unless that scale has been shown to be immune to those effects (cg-18, §4.1.2).

Which test weights do you need?

Start from the scale’s accuracy class. NIST Handbook 105-1 gives the weight classes that are likely to be suitable for each class of scale (HB 105-1, Table 1):

Scale class (Handbook 44 / OIML R 76) Typical examples ASTM E617 classes OIML R 111 classes
I (special) Analytical and micro balances 1 F1
II (high) Precision balances, jewelry scales 1, 2 F1, F2
III (medium) Bench, counting, platform and retail scales 3, 4, 5, 6 M1, M2, M1–2, M2–3
IIII (ordinary) Coarse industrial scales 3, 4, 5, 6 M3

The table is a starting point. Check the actual numbers at the loads you will test, because the tightest requirement is usually at the top of each tolerance band (HB 105-1, §4). Two examples with OIML R 111 maximum permissible errors (R 111, Table 1):

  • A Class III bench scale, 15 kg × 5 g, tested at 15 kg: the maintenance tolerance is 3 e = 15 g, so the weights must be within 5 g. A 10 kg and a 5 kg weight of class M1 are allowed 500 mg and 250 mg, far inside that.
  • A Class II balance tested at 5 g with e = 1 mg: the maintenance tolerance is 1 e = 1 mg, so the weight must be within 0.333 mg. A class F1 5 g weight (0.16 mg) is acceptable (HB 105-1, §4, note).

For high-resolution balances, weights can be used with their certified (conventional) values instead of their nominal ones, as in EURAMET’s worked example, and cg-18 adds their drift since calibration and air buoyancy to the uncertainty (cg-18, §7.1.2). ASTM E617-23 has ten classes, 000, 00 and 0 to 7 (ASTM E617-23, 1.1); OIML R 111 has E1 to M3. Handle small weights with forceps or clean gloves, never bare hands (NIST GMP 10, §2).

Test loads and the three tests

EURAMET cg-18 normally uses three tests: repeatability, errors of indication and eccentricity (cg-18, §5). The client and the lab can agree on details and extra tests, but not on fewer than the minimums below.

Errors of indication (linearity)

At least five test loads spread fairly evenly over the range, for example zero or the minimum load, 25 %, 50 %, 75 % and 100 % of capacity. Each actual load may differ from its target by up to 10 % of Max, as long as consecutive loads are at least 20 % of Max apart. For a much smaller agreed range you can use as few as three points, including its minimum and maximum, with consecutive loads no more than 15 % of the range’s upper limit apart (cg-18, §5.2). The test loads must be standard weights (or substitution loads made with them, for large scales). This is the test that shows linearity: whether the error changes along the range.

exercise to Max first×1Min (20 e)×1≈25 %×550 %×1≈75 %×1Max
  • 0.1 kg, Min (20 e): 1 reading
  • 3.5 kg, ≈25 %: 1 reading
  • 7.5 kg, 50 %: 5 readings
  • 11 kg, ≈75 %: 1 reading
  • 15 kg, Max: 1 reading
  • 9 readings in total. The 5 readings at 50 % are the repeatability test. Zero before each load; record the original indications
Test-load plan for a 15 kg bench scale following EURAMET cg-18: five loads across the range, one reading each, with the repeatability test combined at the middle load. Exercise the scale to Max before you start. Source: loads and rules: EURAMET cg-18, §4.1.3, §5.1 and §5.2; minimum load of 20 e for Class III: Handbook 44, Table 8. Diagram by Acribi.

The loads are normally applied once, in one of four ways: increasing with unloading in between (closest to most real use), increasing continuously, increasing and then decreasing (the sequence used in OIML verification tests), or decreasing from Max (cg-18, §5.2). Loading up and then down is how you see hysteresis: a scale that reads differently at the same load on the way down. Handbook 44’s test notes also include a decreasing-load test for automatic-indicating commercial scales, at the top load of each tolerance band (2.20, N.1.2).

Repeatability

The same load, preferably one single body, placed on the pan at least five times (at least three for loads of 100 kg or more), with the scale zeroed beforehand and the zero checked after each removal. A load between half of Max and Max is common (cg-18, §5.1). The result is the standard deviation of the readings (cg-18, §6.1). You can combine it with the error test by repeating one of the loads. USP <41> (in the text in force until January 2026) asked for at least ten weighings, so pharmaceutical procedures often use ten.

Eccentricity (off-center loading)

A load of about one third of Max, placed in the center and then at four off-center positions (cg-18, §5.3):

12345Front (operator side)Back

Test load: about Max/3Positions per EURAMET cg-18, Fig. 5.3-1

The five load positions of the eccentricity test. The deviation of each off-center reading from the center reading shows how much the result depends on where the load sits on the pan. Source: positions: EURAMET cg-18, Fig. 5.3-1; load: cg-18, §5.3. Diagram by Acribi.

Zero the scale, put the load in the center, then move it to the other four positions in any order and record each reading. If the scale drifts, place and remove the load at each position instead, or return to the center between positions (cg-18, §5.3, methods 3 and 4). Platforms with more than four supports, hoppers and vehicle scales need other patterns (OIML R 76-1, 3.6.2; Handbook 44, N.1.3).

Step-by-step scale calibration procedure

The sequence follows EURAMET cg-18 plus the as-found and as-left logic of any calibration. Adapt it to your scales and write your choices into your calibration procedure.

  1. Identify and inspect

    Record ID, model, Max, d (and e and accuracy class if marked), location and the tolerance you will apply. Check the pan, the display and the level bubble for damage or dirt.

    Damaged or contaminated: record as found, do not calibrate (cg-18, §4.1.3)

  2. Prepare

    Check that the site is suitable (drafts, vibration, stable bench). Level the scale. Switch it on for its warm-up time. Let the weights reach the temperature of the room; class E2 and F1 weights are sensitive to this.

  3. Exercise

    Load the scale at least once to about the largest test load; repeated loading is advised (cg-18, §4.1.3). Do not record these readings.

  4. As-found tests

    Run the repeatability, eccentricity and error-of-indication tests. Read only when the indication is stable and record the original readings, not the errors (cg-18, §4.4.1). Record the air temperature.

  5. Evaluate

    Calculate the standard deviation, the largest eccentric deviation and the error at each load, and compare them with your tolerance.

    Outside tolerance: record as found out of tolerance and open an out-of-tolerance report

  6. Adjust if needed

    Use the manufacturer's method (span or linearity adjustment, internal weight) and only past the threshold in your procedure.

  7. As-left tests

    After any adjustment, repeat the tests and record them as a separate set. If nothing was adjusted, the as-found results are also the as-left results.

  8. Uncertainty, record and label

    Evaluate the uncertainty of each error (or apply your validated values), issue the certificate or record, and label the scale.

Read the indication only when it is stable. If the scale never settles, record an average and note how much the readings varied (cg-18, §4.4.1). On scales where the display step is large compared with the errors you are looking for, labs either switch to a higher-resolution service mode or add small weights to find the exact point where the display changes (cg-18, §4.4.2).

Acceptance criteria and measurement uncertainty

Worked example 1: a 220 g analytical balance (EURAMET cg-18, example H1)

EURAMET’s guide includes a complete worked example: a balance with Max = 220 g and d = 0.1 mg, calibrated with class E2 weights and not adjusted immediately before the calibration (cg-18, App. H1). The guide may only be reproduced in full, so we don’t copy its tables here; the full guide is free from EURAMET, and these are the figures that matter:

  • Repeatability: a 100 g load applied five times gave a standard deviation of s = 0.00011 g, a little over one display step (App. H1.2).
  • Eccentricity: with the same 100 g load, the largest deviation from the center reading was 0.2 mg (App. H1.2).
  • Errors of indication: five loads from 0 to 220 g, each applied once and increasing. The error grew steadily with the load, to +1.3 mg at 220 g: a typical small sensitivity error (App. H1.2).
  • Uncertainty: the expanded uncertainty of the error at 220 g is 3.94 mg (k = 2, 95.45 %). At zero the guide uses k = 2.87 instead of 2, because with only five repeatability readings that term has few degrees of freedom (App. H1.3).

The uncertainty is larger than the error at every load, because the guide used the most conservative estimate of air buoyancy: the air density was not known either when the balance was last adjusted or during the calibration. With an estimate based on a 5 K temperature variation during use instead, the uncertainty at 220 g drops from 3.94 mg to 0.98 mg (cg-18, App. H1.3). In this example, the buoyancy estimate matters more than the balance itself.

What goes into the uncertainty

EURAMET cg-18 splits the uncertainty of each error into the uncertainty of the indication and the uncertainty of the reference mass, u²(E) = u²(I) + u²(mref) (cg-18, §7.1):

Contribution What it captures cg-18
Repeatability Standard deviation s of the repeatability test §7.1.1
Resolution at zero and at load Rounding of the display, d/√12 each §7.1.1
Eccentricity Largest eccentric deviation, scaled to the load: I · ΔImax / (2 · Lecc · √3) §7.1.1
Indication, u(I) Combination of the four above §7.1.1
Weight certificate U/k from the weight certificates, or the class tolerance/√3 if the weights are used at nominal value §7.1.2
Weight drift Possible change since their last calibration §7.1.2
Air buoyancy Air density at calibration vs at adjustment §7.1.2
Convection Weights not at the temperature of the room §7.1.2
Reference mass, u(mref) Combination of the weight terms §7.1.2
Expanded, U = k · u(E) k for a coverage probability of 95.45 % §7.3

At 220 g in EURAMET’s example, the indication terms together come to about 0.18 mg, while the worst-case buoyancy term alone is about 1.96 mg (cg-18, App. H1.3). Our uncertainty calculator combines a budget like this one.

The guide also separates this uncertainty at calibration from the uncertainty of a weighing in everyday use, which adds the effects of single readings, temperature changes, drift of the adjustment between calibrations and the way the balance is used. Estimates of in-use uncertainty that the lab did not measure may be given with the certificate, but clearly separated from the calibration results (cg-18, §7.4).

Pass or fail

A calibration certificate reports errors; deciding whether the scale is acceptable needs a tolerance. EURAMET cg-18 allows conformity to be declared when the error plus the expanded uncertainty of a weighing result in normal use is within the tolerance, |E| + U(W) ≤ Tol (cg-18, §7.5.3). That in-use uncertainty is not the same number as the calibration uncertainty above. In EURAMET’s example the balance adjusts itself with its built-in weight when the temperature changes, and the guide’s “global” in-use uncertainty, which already includes the error, works out to about 2.8 mg at 220 g (cg-18, App. H1.4): so the balance conforms at that load to a tolerance of ±3 mg, but not to one of ±2.5 mg. Other decision rules exist; our guard banding guide explains them, and whichever you use should be agreed and written in your procedure.

Worked example 2: a commercial bench scale, as found and as left

The second example is fictitious: bench scale SC-07, Handbook 44 Class III, Max 15 kg, e = d = 5 g (n = 3000), tested at five loads before and after adjustment, against the Handbook 44 maintenance tolerance (Table 6). The tolerance steps up with the load: 5 g up to 500 e (2.5 kg), 10 g up to 2,000 e (10 kg) and 15 g above.

As found, 0.1 kg: indication 0.1 kg, error 0 g, tolerance ±5 gAs found, 3.5 kg: indication 3.505 kg, error +5 g, tolerance ±10 gAs found, 7.5 kg: indication 7.51 kg, error +10 g, tolerance ±10 gAs found, 11 kg: indication 11.02 kg, error +20 g, tolerance ±15 gAs found, 15 kg: indication 15.025 kg, error +25 g, tolerance ±15 gAs left, 0.1 kg: indication 0.1 kg, error 0 g, tolerance ±5 gAs left, 3.5 kg: indication 3.5 kg, error 0 g, tolerance ±10 gAs left, 7.5 kg: indication 7.505 kg, error +5 g, tolerance ±10 gAs left, 11 kg: indication 11.005 kg, error +5 g, tolerance ±15 gAs left, 15 kg: indication 15.005 kg, error +5 g, tolerance ±15 g

As foundAs leftoutside± HB 44 maintenance tolerance

LoadToleranceAs found: errorAs left: error
0.1 kg±5 g0 gpass0 gpass
3.5 kg±10 g+5 gpass0 gpass
7.5 kg±10 g+10 gpass+5 gpass
11 kg±15 g+20 goutside+5 gpass
15 kg±15 g+25 goutside+5 gpass
Example calibration of a fictitious 15 kg × 5 g Class III bench scale: error at each load, as found and as left, against the Handbook 44 maintenance tolerance for Class III. Source: tolerance: NIST Handbook 44 (2026), 2.20 Table 6; example data by Acribi, computed at build time.
  • As found: the scale read high, increasingly so with the load: +20 g at 11 kg and +25 g at 15 kg, both outside the ±15 g tolerance. In service, that is a scale that overcharges customers on heavy items.
  • As left: after a span adjustment the largest error is +5 g, inside the maintenance tolerance and also inside the acceptance tolerance (half of it, Handbook 44 T.N.3.2) that an official would apply when testing the scale within 30 days after corrective service (G-T.1).

The eccentricity test, with a 5 kg load (Max/3), was fine before and after: no off-center reading differed from the center by more than one division, well inside the 10 g tolerance at that load.

1reference2±0 g3±0 g4±0 g5+5 gFront (operator side)Back

Test load: 5 kg (Max/3)Positions per EURAMET cg-18, Fig. 5.3-1

PositionIndication (kg)Deviation from center (g)
1. Center5.000—
2. Front left5.000±0
3. Back left5.000±0
4. Back right5.000±0
5. Front right5.005+5 (largest)
As-found eccentricity test of the fictitious bench scale with a 5 kg load. The largest deviation from the center reading is +5 g (one division). Source: positions: EURAMET cg-18, Fig. 5.3-1; tolerance at 5 kg (1,000 e): Handbook 44, Table 6; example data by Acribi. Diagram by Acribi.

The display step here equals e, so each reading hides up to half a division of rounding. Official tests and careful calibrations remove it with small extra weights (OIML R 76-1, 3.5.3.2; cg-18, §4.4.2).

Minimum weight and USP <41>

A scale’s relative uncertainty grows as the load gets smaller, because parts of its uncertainty, such as repeatability and resolution, don’t shrink with the load. The minimum weight is the smallest net sample for which the relative uncertainty still meets your requirement (cg-18, App. G). It refers to the sample, not the sample plus its container, and users often apply a safety factor because real weighing conditions are worse than at calibration (cg-18, App. G). For EURAMET’s example balance, with a 1 % requirement and a safety factor of 3, the guide gets a minimum weight of 0.0729 g (cg-18, App. H1.4).

USP General Chapter <41> Balances sets this for balances used in pharmaceutical work for materials that must be accurately weighed. A revised chapter became official on February 1, 2026 (see the box below). The text in force until January 2026, as amended in 2014, has two tests (USP <41>, USP 38 text; Brady Systems):

  • Repeatability: weigh one test weight at least ten times. Twice the standard deviation divided by the smallest net weight you intend to weigh must not exceed 0.10 %. If the standard deviation is smaller than 0.41 d (d = scale interval), use 0.41 d instead. The test weight doesn’t need to be calibrated.
  • Accuracy: the reading of a test weight between 5 % and 100 % of capacity must be within 0.10 % of the weight’s value. The weight’s maximum permissible error, or its calibration uncertainty, must be no more than one third of that limit; the chapter refers to ASTM E617 and OIML R 111.

From the repeatability criterion, the minimum weight is 2000 × s, and a review of the revised chapter gives the same formula, net of the tare container (Burgess and McDowall, LCGC 2026). With the standard deviation of EURAMET’s example balance, 0.00011 g, that is about 0.22 g; under the pre-2026 text, if the balance repeated better than 0.41 d = 0.041 mg, the floor would be 2000 × 0.041 mg = 82 mg. (EURAMET’s example used five repeatability readings; USP asks for ten.)

Handbook 44 has a similar, simpler idea for commercial scales: a recommended minimum load, such as 20 d for Class III scales and 100 d for Class I (Handbook 44, 2.20 UR.3.1, Table 8).

What to record on a scale calibration certificate

Whether you issue a certificate or fill in an internal record, keep (cg-18, §8):

  • Identification: scale ID, manufacturer, model, type, Max, d (and e, class), location; the lab and the certificate.
  • Procedure: date, place, environmental conditions, the method or procedure number, any limited range agreed, the tolerance applied.
  • Adjustment: whether the scale was adjusted, internally or externally, and with which weight.
  • Equipment: the test weights (class, certificate) and how traceability is established.
  • Results: the indications or errors at each load, the standard deviation (and whether it refers to a single reading), the eccentricity results, as found and as left.
  • Uncertainty: the expanded uncertainty of each error, the coverage factor and the coverage probability.
  • Decision: pass or fail against the stated tolerance and the decision rule; the minimum weight if you determine it.
  • Who and when: technician, date, next due date.

Our guides to calibration certificates and calibration records cover each field. Print the status sticker with the free calibration label generator.

How often to calibrate a scale

EURAMET cg-18, OIML R 76 and Handbook 44 don’t set a calibration interval for scales used outside legal metrology. Base it on the risk of a wrong weighing, how heavily and where the scale is used, and what past calibrations found; the 2026 revision of USP <41> asks for the same risk-based approach for calibration and performance checks (ECA Academy, 2024). Our calibration intervals guide explains the methods.

Between calibrations, short routine checks catch problems early. USP <1251> describes such performance checks for analytical balances, with a frequency based on risk (Brady Systems; ECA Academy, 2024); a quick check with one certified weight and an occasional repeatability or corner check are the usual building blocks. Recalibrate, or at least recheck, when a scale is:

  • moved to another place (cg-18, §4.1.2);
  • repaired, overloaded or dropped;
  • reading differently from another calibrated scale, or failing a routine check.

Weights need their own calibration. For field standard weights, NIST notes intervals are often one year at first, extended based on stability data up to a limit set by regulations but generally not beyond five years (HB 105-1, §6.4).

When a scale fails calibration

An as-found error outside tolerance means more than “adjust the scale”. Everything weighed on it since its last good calibration may be wrong, by about the error found at the loads used. In the bench-scale example, items above about 10 kg were weighed up to 25 g heavy. Our guide to out-of-tolerance results walks through the impact assessment.

Common mistakes when calibrating a scale

Mistake Why it matters Do this instead
Adjusting with one weight and calling it calibrated Nothing is known about the rest of the range, repeatability or corners Test at five loads, repeatability and eccentricity (cg-18, §5)
Adjusting before measuring The as-found result is lost Record as found first, then adjust
Checking with the same weight used to adjust Any error in that weight goes unnoticed Check with a different, certified weight
Weights without a certificate, or of too low a class You don’t know their error Error plus uncertainty below one third of the tolerance
Weights straight from a cold car or a warm pocket Air currents around the weight change the reading Let them reach room temperature (cg-18, §4.2.3; NIST GMP 10)
Skipping warm-up and exercise The first readings drift and repeat worse Warm up, then load to Max at least once
Moving the scale after calibration Gravity, environment and transport can change it Calibrate where it is used
Static, drafts, an uneven bench Erratic readings blamed on the scale Fix the environment first (NIST GMP 10, §1)
Weighing below the minimum weight Relative uncertainty too large Determine the minimum weight and stay above it

FAQ

How do I calibrate a digital scale without calibration weights?

You can't calibrate it in the full sense, because calibration compares the scale with a load whose mass is known and traceable. What you can do without weights is check how the scale behaves: weigh the same object ten times to see whether the readings repeat, and move it to the four corners of the pan to see whether the reading changes. Those tests don't need a known mass. To check or adjust the value the scale shows, you need a weight of known mass, ideally one with a certificate.

Can I use coins or a bag of sugar to calibrate a scale?

Not to calibrate it. The mass printed on a coin specification or a sugar bag is a nominal value, not a measured one with a stated uncertainty, and wear, wrapping and moisture change it. If you adjust a scale to one of them, the scale inherits its error. Coins are fine as a constant load for a repeatability or corner check, where the actual mass doesn't matter.

What is the difference between internal and external calibration on a balance?

Internal calibration uses a weight built into the balance; external calibration uses a weight you place on the pan. Both are adjustments: they reset the balance's sensitivity at one load. Neither replaces a calibration, which applies traceable test weights at several loads, checks repeatability and off-center loading, and states the errors with their uncertainty. EURAMET cg-18 recommends that the certificate say whether the balance was adjusted internally or externally, and with which weight.

What class of calibration weight do I need?

One whose error (plus uncertainty, if you use it at its nominal value) is no more than about a third of the tolerance you are checking. NIST Handbook 105-1 maps scale classes to weight classes: Class I scales with ASTM Class 1 or OIML F1 weights, Class II with ASTM 1 or 2 or OIML F1 or F2, and Class III and IIII scales with ASTM 3 to 6 or OIML M classes. Check the actual tolerance at the load you test, because the mapping is only a starting point.

How often should a scale or balance be calibrated?

No standard sets one interval for every scale. Base it on risk and history: how critical the weighing is, how heavily the scale is used, its environment, and how far it has drifted at past calibrations. Recalibrate after the scale is moved, repaired, overloaded or dropped. The 2026 revision of USP <41> also asks for a risk-based frequency for calibration and performance checks.

What does legal for trade or NTEP mean?

A scale used to sell or charge by weight (a deli, postal or airport luggage scale) is a commercial device. All 50 US states have adopted NIST Handbook 44. NIST says a commercial scale should have an active NTEP Certificate of Conformance, which shows the model was evaluated against Handbook 44, and must be inspected and approved by the state where it is used. A scale that is not legal for trade simply lacks that type approval; it is not necessarily inaccurate.

Why does my scale keep showing different readings?

Usually the environment or the setup, not the calibration: drafts, vibration, a surface that isn't level or stable, static electricity (worse below 40 % relative humidity), a sample warmer or colder than the air, evaporation, or a scale that hasn't warmed up. NIST notes that a temperature difference of a few degrees between a weight and the balance can shift readings by tenths of a milligram on small weights. Fix these first, then run a repeatability test.

What are the 5 points of a scale calibration?

The phrase is used for two different things. The error-of-indication test in EURAMET cg-18 uses at least five loads spread over the range, for example zero or the minimum, 25 %, 50 %, 75 % and 100 % of capacity. The eccentricity test uses five positions on the pan: the center and four off-center positions, front left, back left, back right and front right.

What is USP <41> and what does it require?

USP General Chapter <41> sets requirements for balances used to weigh materials that must be accurately weighed in pharmaceutical work. A revised version became official on February 1, 2026, adding a calibration section and a risk-based frequency for calibration and performance checks. The text in force until January 2026 had two tests: repeatability (at least ten weighings of one test weight; twice the standard deviation divided by the smallest net weight must not exceed 0.10 %, with the standard deviation replaced by 0.41 d when smaller) and accuracy (within 0.10 % of a test weight between 5 % and 100 % of capacity). We have not been able to confirm that every figure carries over unchanged to the 2026 text, so check the current chapter.

Sources

  1. EURAMET. EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 18 (cg-18), Guidelines on the Calibration of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments, version 4.0. 2015 — Current version (checked 2026-10-16). §1, §4.1–4.4, §5, §6, §7.1–7.5, §8, App. G, App. H1 (pp. 60–67). Figures cited, not reproduced: cg-18 may be reproduced only in full, extracts need EURAMET's permission
  2. OIML. OIML R 76-1:2006, Non-automatic weighing instruments, Part 1: Metrological and technical requirements. 2006 — 3.2 (Table 3), 3.5.1–3.5.2 (Table 6), 3.6.1–3.6.2, 3.7.1, 3.9.2. Under revision; 2006 is the current edition
  3. OIML. OIML R 111-1:2004, Weights of classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1-2, M2, M2-3 and M3 (with Amendment 2025). 2004 — 1.3.1 (classes), 5.2, Table 1 (maximum permissible errors)
  4. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices, 2026 edition. 2026 — G-T.1, G-T.2; 2.20 Scales: Table 3, N.1.2.1, N.2, T.N.3.1–T.N.3.2, Table 6, T.N.4.4, T.N.5, UR.3.1 (Table 8); App. A 3.2
  5. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. NIST Handbook 105-1, Specifications and Tolerances for Field Standard Weights. 2019 — §4, Table 1 (weight classes for each scale class) and note; §6.4
  6. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. NIST GMP 10, Good Measurement Practice for Understanding Factors Affecting Weighing Operations (in NISTIR 6969-2019). 2019 — §1 environment, §2 handling weights, §3 exercising the balance
  7. NIST Office of Weights and Measures. Weighing FAQs — Handbook 44 adoption, NTEP Certificate of Conformance, state approval; checked 2026-10-16
  8. National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM). National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP) — NTEP and NCWM Publication 14; checked 2026-10-16
  9. JCGM / BIPM. International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), JCGM 200:2012. 2012 — 2.39 calibration, 3.11 adjustment
  10. ASTM International. ASTM E617-23, Standard Specification for Laboratory Weights and Precision Mass Standards (scope). 2023 — Paid standard; classes and scope only (1.1, 1.3)
  11. United States Pharmacopeia. USP General Chapter <41> Balances (USP 38–NF 33 text, official 2013 to January 2026) — Paid publication; text read on a third-party copy of USP 38 (criteria as amended by the interim revision of July 1, 2014). Superseded by the revision official February 1, 2026
  12. United States Pharmacopeia. USP General Chapter <41> Balances, proposed revision (Pharmacopeial Forum, 2024): preview. 2024 — Public summary of the changes proposed for the revision that became official February 1, 2026; full text for subscribers
  13. ECA Academy (gmp-compliance.org). USP: Chapters Balances <41> and Weighing on an Analytical Balance <1251> final. 2025 — Both chapters finalized, official February 2026
  14. Brady Systems. Revised USP chapters <41> and <1251> (comparison of the 2013 revision)
  15. ECA Academy (gmp-compliance.org). USP: Commenting on Balances <41> and Weighing on an Analytical Balance <1251> possible again. 2024 — Scope of the revision official in 2026
  16. LCGC International. A Question of Balance? Part III: Weighing Isn't an Uncertain Process, Is It? (C. Burgess and R. D. McDowall). 2026 — Revised USP <41>: minimum weight 2000 s, net of tare, 0.10 % limit
  17. OHAUS. Navigator Balance Calibration Guide (P/N 83033982) — Manufacturer example of span and linearity calibration (adjustment)